If I can admit it, so can you – we’ve all been subject to distracted driving and lucky enough not to get caught, but that’s no longer the case. Yesterday, Governor Cuomo approved legislation raising texting while driving to a primary offense.

That distracted driving poses a serious threat and draws national concern is no surprise, but the GHSA (Governors Highway Safety Association) has arrived at the startling statistic that smartphones are tied to 25% of all car crashes.

So what can we do about it?

First, companies can (and should) create internal use policies, particularly for those commuting daily with their smartphone as their only lifeline.

Secondly, we can use advanced technology to solve the problem. Whether it’s tools like T-Mobile’s DriveSmart or the SAFECELLapp offered for the iPhone and Android that rewards users for safe driving, there’s a better alternative than “it won’t happen to me”.

In 2007, 5 local girls suffered a tragic fatality in consequence of distracted driving; consider how that number has grown exponentially as new technology drives our daily lives and people are not only calling and texting, but sifting through emails, scrolling their news feed, and checking Twitter updates during rush hour traffic.

Isn’t it time you became a real “smart” phone user?

 
Stephanie C.

(Photo courtesy of corbisimages.com)

Laptops, pens, and paper are all utilized by the MSMK4 cohort.

More than a year ago, the Washington Post reported that colleges and universities were banning laptops from their classrooms in an article titled “Wide Web of diversions gets laptops evicted from lecture halls”.  This is an interesting notion as the popularity of new online degree options like Roberts Wesleyan College’s Master of Science in Strategic Leadership program grow exponentially.  How can some institutions (not RWC, of course) be so polarized yet still appeal to the students who are now products of the technology?

The answer is to accept the fact that laptops, the student’s attention span, and willingness to participate, are entirely up to the student.  If participation is a requirement of the class and it is soundly based in classroom discussion, the individual’s grades will reflect their distractions from their laptop and render them unable to participate with meaningful contributions.  Banning of any technology sends the wrong message about the willingness of the instructor, and subsequently, the institution, to advance and offer the most up-to-date and pertinent information to their students.  Certainly, students have a different style of learning, communication, and willingness to maintain undivided attention than they did ten years ago, but this is not an indication of diminished quality, rather a sign for educators to evolve their styles to interact with their audience.

-Kelly